Reade Seligmann is innocent. The rape charges are a hoax. Adding up the evidence we have proves that. There are also multiple future witnesses waiting to support Mr. Seligmann's innocence. Why is he still under indictment?
The case for Reade William Selimann's innocence [courttv.com]
+ Jason Bissey [the neighbor] affidavit
+ Reade Seligmann's Verizon phone log
+ Ahmad Elmostafa a.k.a Moez Mostafa, owner of On Time Taxi, affidavit
+ Ken Johnson affidavit [retired major with the Raleigh Police Department/Private Investigator]
+ Robert Wellington [lacrosse teammate] sworn affidavit
+ Wachovia Bank ATM photos
+ statement from Kim Roberts/Pittman
+ digital photos from party
+ medical reports
+ 0% credibility of accuser
------pending--------
+ Mr. Seligmann's own statement
+ sworn statement from girlfriend [regarding cell phone calls] (?)
+ sworn statements from X number of other lacrosse teammates including Mr. Evans and Mr. Finnerty
-----------------------
= Reade Seligmann is INNOCENT
Q.E.D. - Therefore Mr. Evans & Mr. Finnerty are innocent.
sources:
Duke Lacrosse Rape Timeline [TJN, updated June 16, 2006]
MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY (.pdf) [KirkOsborn.com, May 1, 2006]
Duke Lacrosse Scandal: Kim Roberts/Pittman Police Statement [TJN, June 12, 2006]
Friday, June 16, 2006
Duke Lacrosse Scanal: The Innocence Equation